Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Important Genealogy in Book of Ruth



This is the html version of the file http://jbq.jewishbible.org/assets/Uploads/382/ruthgenealogy.pdf.
Google automatically generates html versions of documents as we crawl the web.

Page 1

Zvi Ron received semikha from the Israeli Rabbanut and his Ph.D. in Jewish Theology from Sper-
tus University. He is an educator living in Neve Daniel, Israel and the author of Sefer Katan ve-
Gadol (Rossi Publications: 2006) about the large and small letters in Tanakh. He is the Deputy
Editor of Jewish Bible Quarterly.
THE GENEALOGICAL LIST IN THE BOOK OF RUTH:
A SYMBOLIC APPROACH
ZVI RON
The Book of Ruth concludes with a genealogical list tracing the ancestry of
King David all the way from Perez son of Judah.
Now these are the generations of Perez: Perez begot Hezron; and He-
zron begot Ram, and Ram begot Amminadab; and Amminadab begot
Nahshon, and Nahshon begot Salma; and Salmon begot Boaz, and
Boaz begot Obed; and Obed begot Jesse, and Jesse begot David.
(Ruth 4:18-22).
This genealogical list is constructed in a way that indicates a particular
symbolism. In this article, we will note the symbols found in the list and de-
termine at what point the list shifts from a historic record to a symbolic one.
Additionally, we will see that the symbolic approach to this list solves a ma-
jor chronological difficulty.
There are ten people listed in this genealogy, paralleling other such lists in
Genesis. In Genesis 5, we have a genealogical list of the ten generations from
Adam to Noah. Genesis 11:10-26 contains another genealogical list of ten
generations, from Shem to Abraham. The first major era is from the Creation
to the Flood. The next list is found after the description of the nations des-
cended from Noah (Gen. 10) and the Tower of Babel narrative (11:1-9),
when the world is divided into many languages. These two sections indicate
that the world is now divided into many different groups. The genealogical
list in Genesis 11 covers the period from the Flood until the birth of Abra-
ham, patriarch of the Israelite people, the group on which the Bible will focus
from this chapter onward. A list of ten generations is used to indicate a transi-
tion from one major era to another. These ten-generation epochs were unders-
tood to be significant by the rabbis as well.
1
Note also that if we follow the genealogy from Adam through his descen-
dants, Noah is the tenth in line, Abraham the twentieth, and Boaz the thir-
tieth.
2
The list of ancestors in Ruth was written as a ten-generation list to


ZVI RON
JEWISH BIBLE QUARTERLY
86
evoke these earlier lists, and also to indicate that here a new epoch was be-
ginning; the epoch of the Davidic monarchy. Just as Noah began the post-
Flood world and Abraham began the Israelite people in a new world divided
into nations, David began the dynasty that will ultimately lead to messianic
times under the Messiah son of David.
The fact that David occupies the tenth position in this list is noted in rab-
binic literature as being significant. For example, Hayyim Yosef David Azu-
lai (the Hida) explains that the reason King David's name is written with an
extra letter "yud" in Books of I and II Chronicles [דיוד] is to indicate that he is
tenth in the genealogical list found in Ruth.
3
Others ascribe mystical impor-
tance to the fact that David is the tenth from Perez.
4
In this list the seventh person is Boaz, the hero of the Book of Ruth. In Ge-
nesis 5, the seventh person in the list is the saintly Enoch, who walked with
God (Gen. 5:24). Seven is always a significant number in the Bible; the se-
venth person on the list would draw special attention. The figures who occu-
py the seventh position and its multiples from Adam onward and on all have
either biblical or rabbinic significance; Enoch is the seventh, Eber the four-
teenth,
5
Isaac the twenty-first, and Nahshon the twenty-eighth.
6
Even if the
Bible itself did not always indicate that the seventh descendants were special,
the Rabbis did feel this way and noted in the Midrash what was so significant
about them. Note also that in I Chronicles 2:15 David himself is listed as the
seventh son of Jesse.
7,8
Even the term used to introduce this genealogical list, "generations [תודלות
–toldot]," is only found in the Torah, and nowhere else in the Prophets or
Writings. In the Torah, this term is found eleven times in Genesis and once in
Numbers.
9
Using this particular word in Ruth hints that the list should be
viewed as part of the Genesis family of genealogical lists. Furthermore, the
word toldot itself is only written using the letter "vav" at the end (תודלות as
opposed to being written
)
תדלות in two places in Tanakh, here in Ruth 4:18
and in Genesis 2:4, the prelude to the sin of Adam. The Midrash comments
that this is to hint that the six curses that came to the world as a result of the
sin of Adam will be undone with the coming of the Messiah.
10
A similar
theme is found in Exodus Rabbah, 30:3, which connects Ruth to Genesis 2:4
by explaining that the curse of mortality stemming from the sin of Adam will
be undone with the coming of the Messiah. The Rabbis understood that the


GENEALOGICAL LIST IN THE BOOK OF RUTH
Vol. 38, No. 2, 2010
87
Ruth list was written in a way that indicates that it represents the culmination
of the cosmic saga of Genesis, the coming of the Messiah.
Considering that one of the major reasons given for the writing of the Book
of Ruth is to trace the lineage of King David,
11
it makes sense that the genea-
logical list was written using symbols that would indicate that Boaz and Da-
vid are figures of great significance.
THE CHRONOLOGICAL PROBLEM
If we understand that this genealogical list was intended as a symbolic re-
presentation, the chronological problem in this passage can be resolved. This
well- known problem is spelled out by Abraham Ibn Ezra in his commentary
to Ruth 4:17. He begins by explaining that we know Nahshon was the leader
of the tribe of Judah at the time of the Exodus from Egypt (Num. 1:7), and
since that entire generation died in the wilderness, only his son Salma would
have been the first in the lineage to enter Israel. Even though only those over
the age of twenty at the time of the report of the spies died in the wilderness,
it is reasonable to assume that Nahshon was in fact over twenty at that time,
since he was already the leader of the tribe of Judah. In any event we are not
told that he entered Israel. This concurs with Seder Olam Chapter 12: "Nah-
shon son of Amminadab died in the second year after the Exodus. Salmon
was of those who entered the Land."
Ibn Ezra continues the calculation by stating that in I Kings 6:1 we are told:
In the four hundred and eightieth year after the Children of Israel's exodus
from the land of Egypt, in the fourth year of Solomon's reign over Israel, in
the month of Ziv which is the second month, he built the Temple to God.
Since the Israelites wandered for 40 years before entering the Land of Israel,
we are left with 440 years from entering Israel until the Temple. If we then
subtract the 70 years of King David's life and the four years of King Solo-
mon's reign before the Temple was built, we are left with 366 years from
entering Israel to the birth of David. This period of 366 years is covered by
only four ancestors of David: Salma, Boaz, Obed, and Jesse.
Based on this calculation, even if Salma was an infant when he entered
Israel, each one of these Davidic ancestors would have had to father the next
in line at a very advanced age (an average age of 91!) in order to encompass
more than three-and-a-half centuries. Ibn Ezra further states that even if you


ZVI RON
JEWISH BIBLE QUARTERLY
88
say that Nahshon was less than twenty years old in the wilderness and did in
fact enter Israel (in contradiction to Seder Olam), this still leaves us with an
average age in the eighties for each member of the lineage to father the next
in line.
The Midrash deals with this difficulty by explaining that certain of the an-
cestors of David lived extremely long lives. Based on different midrashic
texts,
12
either Obed
13
or Jesse
14
lived to be over 400 years old, or alternative-
ly, Boaz, Obed and Jesse together lived for a period of over 400 years.
15
Ibn Ezra himself accepts that David's ancestors in fact fathered sons when
in their eighties. Boaz indicated that he was an old man when he told Ruth,
'You have made your latest act of kindness greater than the first, in that you
have not gone after younger men' (Ruth 3:10). Ruth Rabbah 6:2 states that
Boaz was eighty years old at the time the story in the Book of Ruth took
place. Since we know that David was the eighth son of Jesse (I Sam. 16:10-
11) it is reasonable to assume that Jesse was an old man when he begot him.
Ibn Ezra concludes that the four immediate patriarchal ancestors of King Da-
vid must have all fathered the next in line when they were at least in their
eighties.
Ramban, in his commentary to Genesis 46:15, also mentions that the ances-
tors of King David all fathered sons at a very advanced age. He notes that
even though by that time in history people did not live as long as in the time
of Abraham, miraculously these four men fathered children close to the time
of their death, at very advanced ages. Thus, the traditional rabbinic answer to
the puzzle of the genealogical list in Ruth is to explain that in fact Salma,
Boaz, Obed, and Jesse all fathered children while in their eighties or nineties.
It seems strange that these four ancestors all begot children at such an old
age.
16
Even more so when we compare the last four ancestors to the earlier
ancestors of King David: Judah, Perez, Hezron, Ram, Amminadab and Nah-
shon. Here we have six individuals covering the entire period of the sojourn
in Egypt. The Talmud calculates that the time in Egypt was 210 years,
17
mak-
ing the time from one generation to another about 35 years. This means that
according to the approach of Ibn Ezra and Ramban, before the Exodus the
next in line was born when his father was in his thirties and after the Exodus
this age more than doubled.


GENEALOGICAL LIST IN THE BOOK OF RUTH
Vol. 38, No. 2, 2010
89
A SYMBOLIC APPROACH
The difficulty raised by this section in Ruth disappears when we understand
that the list is a symbolic one, and not meant to be understood as an actual
historical record. There were in fact more ancestors between Perez and Da-
vid, but they were excluded from the genealogical list in order to maintain the
special seven-ten symbolism.
18
Where in this list is the ellipsis, where would the missing ancestors of King
David fit in? The lineage from Ruth is also found in I Chronicles 2:5-15.
There are additional details there regarding brothers and sisters, but the Da-
vidic lineage is the same.
The sons of Perez: Hezron and Hamul . . . . The sons of Hezron
who were born to him: Jerahmeel, Ram, and Chelubai; and Ram
begot Amminadab; and Amminadab begot Nahshon, the leader of
the sons of Judah; and Nahshon begot Salma; and Salma begot
Boaz, and Boaz begot Obed; and Obed begot Jesse; and Jesse
begot his firstborn Eliab, and Abinadab the second, and Shimea
the third, Nethanel the fourth, Raddai the fifth, Ozem the the
sixth, and David the seventh (I Chron. 2:5-15).
We see that the lineage through Hezron and Ram includes additional in-
formation, the brothers of the Davidic ancestors. The siblings of David are
listed as well. From Amminadab to Jesse we have a simple list of fathers and
sons. This is the formulaic part of the list that can shift from the historical to
the symbolic. The chronological problem only begins after the Exodus, so we
can understand the genealogy until that point (Nahshon) to be a complete
historical record. Since the birth of Obed is an integral part of the Ruth narra-
tive, and David being the son of Jesse is integral to the narrative in Samuel I,
these connections should also be viewed as literal and historical.
This leaves us with only a few points on the list where we can veer from
the historical to the symbolic, Nahshon to Salma, Salma to Boaz, and Obed to
Jesse.
19
It is interesting to note that other than in the genealogical lists in Ruth
and I Chronicles, Boaz and Jesse are never referred to as "Boaz son of Sal-
ma" or "Jesse son of Obed." It seems that the best candidate for the actual
ellipsis point on the genealogical list is Salma, the figure who outside of these
two genealogical lists is not found linked to either his father or son.
20

ZVI RON
JEWISH BIBLE QUARTERLY
90
The story of Ruth takes place in the days when the judges judged (Ruth
1:1). We do not know when exactly during the period of the Judges the story
took place, and there are many approaches found in rabbinic literature.
21
The
opinion of Rav is that Boaz is to be identified with the judge Ibzan from
Bethlehem (Jud. 12:8).
22
Even if we do not accept that Boaz was literally the
same person as Ibzan, this timeline puts Boaz living 105 years before the end
of the time of the Judges, which works out well historically in terms of hav-
ing David the fourth generation from Boaz.
23
The one person in the genealo-
gy who covers all the years from entering the Land of Israel through Joshua
and over 200 years of judges until the time of Ibzan is Salma. If we under-
stand that there were in fact many unrecorded generations leading up to and
descending from Salma, the non-historical element of the genealogical list is
minimized to just one link in the lineage. All of the ancestors before and after
him can be viewed as historic and literally fathering the next in line, and at a
reasonable age.
Salma's role as a representative of many unmentioned generations can also
be seen in his position in the lineage. The Nahshon-Salma transition is found
in the exact middle, covering the shift between the first five ancestors and the
last five. It also covers the transition from wandering in the wilderness to
entering the Land of Israel, from Mosaic to post-Mosaic times.
24
While it may seem unusual to view Salma as a representative of many un-
listed generations, this understanding resolves the chronological problem that
the genealogy raises and fits in with the idea that the lineage itself is written
in a symbolic style. In fact, there are other places where we find shortcuts in
genealogical lists. Radak notes that for the sake of brevity, in I Chronicles
1:17, four of the grandsons of Shem; Uz, Hul, Gether, and Meshech, are
listed as if they were his sons. Similarly, Radak explains that in I Chronicles
1:36, Timna is listed as if she was the child of Eliphaz, while in actuality she
was his concubine, again for the sake of brevity. Radak further explains that
it is common practice to refer to grandchildren simply as children, as in I
Chronicles 3:15 where Shallum is listed as the son of Josiah even though,
according to Radak, he was actually the son of Jehoakim and grandson of
Josiah. While Radak explains that generations were sometimes skipped for
the sake of brevity, here in the Davidic lineage they were skipped in order to
create a symbolically and numerically significant list of ancestors.


GENEALOGICAL LIST IN THE BOOK OF RUTH
Vol. 38, No. 2, 2010
91
The Midrash also understood Salma to be a transitional figure. In Ruth
Rabbah, 8:1, the Midrash asks why Salma is called Salma when he is men-
tioned as the son of Nahshon, but his name is changed to Salmon when he is
listed as the father of Boaz. The answer given is that the name Salmon is
meant to evoke the word sulam [ladder], to indicate that "up until this point it
is a ladder for princes, from this point in the lineage onward it is a ladder for
kings." We can view Salma as a representative of many missing generations
in the lineage, called in the Midrash the "ladder for princes" before the transi-
tional mid-point, and the "ladder for kings" after.
25
NOTES
1. Avot 5:2.
2. From Abraham to Boaz: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Judah, Perez, Hezron, Ram, Amminadab,
Nahshon, Salma, Boaz.
3. Torat Hida HaShalem – Ruth (Jerusalem: Ahavat Shalom, 1997) p. 104. The numerical value
of the letter "yud" is ten.
4. See for example the commentary Melo HaOmer to Ruth 2:17 and Lehem Lefi Ha-Taf, dalet, 7.
5. According to rabbinic tradition, Eber was the teacher of Jacob (Megillah 16b, 17a). He was
also a great prophet (Genesis Rabbah 37:7) and moral authority (Genesis Rabbah 52:11).
6. According to rabbinic tradition, in addition to being the head of the tribe of Judah, Nahshon
was the first Israelite to jump into the Red Sea (Sotah 36a, see also Numbers Rabbah 13:7).
7. This is in contradiction to I Samuel 16:10-11 where he is the eighth, see Radak on I Chroni-
cles 2:15 who offers multiple resolutions to this conflict.
8. On the prominence of the seventh and tenth position in genealogical lists in general and in
Ruth in particular, see Jack M. Sasson, Ruth: A New Translation with a Philological Commen-
tary and a Formalist-Folklorist Interpretation, 2nd Edition (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic
Press, 1989) pp. 183-184. See also the remarks of the Ben Ish Hai in his work Aderet Eliyahu,
Parshat Va-Yehi, where he takes this idea even further, noting that Judah was the seventh Jew in
the world (Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Reuben, Shimon, Levi, Judah).
9. Da'at Mikra – Hamesh Megillot (Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1990) p. 4, note 2.
10. Genesis Rabbah 12:6. The numerical value of the letter "vav" is six.
11. See Torah Shelemah – Megillat Ruth (Jerusalem: American Biblical Encyclopedia Society,
1999) pp. 113-116, and Da'at Mikra – Hamesh Megillot (Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1990)
p. 4.
12. See Midrash Lekah Tov, Genesis 47, note 22, for a discussion of the textual variants.
13. Midrash Tanhuma, Va-Yehi, 2.
14. See the commentary Anaf Yosef to Midrash Tanhuma, Va-Yehi, 2.
15. Genesis Rabbah, 96:4. See there the commentary of Rabbi David Luria. This Midrash also
appears in Yalkut Shimoni, Genesis, 156. See also Rashi on I Chronicles 2:11, where he states
that Boaz was over 300 years old when he fathered Obed.
16. For a traditional/literalist approach to these and other figures who lived extremely long lives,
see David Havlin, Lehatzdik Kodesh (Israel, 1991) pp. 171-173.


ZVI RON
JEWISH BIBLE QUARTERLY
92
17. See Rashi, Exodus 12:40.
18. Other approaches have been suggested to resolve this chronological difficulty. See for exam-
ple, Philip Biberfield, Universal Jewish History vol. 1 (New York: Spero Foundation, 1948) pp.
29-33.
19. See also Robert L. Hubbard, The New International Commentary on the Old Testament – the
Book of Ruth (Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1988) p. 284.
20. See also Entziklopediyah Olam Ha-Tanakh – Megillot vol.1 (Jerusalem: Revivim, 1987) pp.
104-105, for additional evidence that the ellipsis occurs with Salma.
21. Da'at Mikra – Hamesh Megillot (Jerusalem: Mossad Harav Kook, 1990) p. 16.
22. Bava Batra 91a.
23. Da'at Mikra, p. 16.
24. Hubbard, p.280. The significance of the Nahshon-Salma transition is found in traditional
rabbinic literature as well, see for example the commentary of the Vilna Gaon to the Song of
Songs, 2:8, where he writes that the Israelites were originally only supposed to leave Egypt
during the time of Salma, but due to God's mercy the Exodus took place during the time of his
father Nahshon.
25. Thanks to my dear friend and student Jonathan Engel for pointing out this interpretation of
the Midrash.
INSTRUCTIONS FOR AUTHORS
Detailed Instructions for Authors and journal style
can be found on our Internet website:
http://www.jewishbible.org

at

No comments:

Post a Comment