Thursday, July 5, 2018

Song of Song’s influence on Sirach 24


Image result for lady wisdom song of songs


 

by

 

Damien F. Mackey

 

 

 

“The rivers surrounding Eden are also mentioned in Sir 24:25–27.27

In addition to these and many other probable subtexts, the Song of Songs provides

a parallel for almost every line of Sir 24:13–20”.

 

Martti Nissinen

 

 

 

Against arguments that all semblance and trace of the four antediluvian rivers of Genesis 2 have been completely annihilated by a supposedly global Noachic Flood, I have previously noted that:

 

The … Book of Sirach (or Ecclesiasticus) provides us with a further ancient testimony of these four rivers of Genesis 2, even apparently as then currently active; but now with the inclusion of two new names, the Jordan and the Nile, that may well provide us with a clue to the all-important, but un-named river of Paradise itself (Sirach 24:25-27):

 

This is what makes wisdom brim like the Pishon, like the Tigris in the season of fruit, what makes understanding brim over like the Euphrates, like the Jordan at harvest time; and makes discipline flow like the Nile, like the Gihon at the time of vintage.

 

Some argue that the Gihon” here is being identified with the Nile; whilst others prefer, from their interpretation of the parallelism used here, that Sirach had six rivers in mind. Yahuda, as we shall … find, will conclude quite independently from this that there is a connection  between Gihon and the Nile, that the Gihon is in fact the Nubian Nile.

 

[End of quote]

 

In other words, the four antediluvian rivers were still viable rivers as late as the time of Sirach, conventionally dated to the C2nd BC – though I would probably now have to date this Hebrew sage even later on the basis of my radical article of revision:

 

A New Timetable for the Nativity of Jesus Christ

 


 

Now Martti Nissinen, in his article, “Wisdom as Mediatrix in Sirach 24: Ben Sira, Love Lyrics, and Prophecy”, has drawn attention to a hitherto overlooked (“virtually unnoticed so far”) aspect of Sirach 24 which is, he writes, its dependence upon king Solomon’s Song of Songs.

The author begins as follows:

 

Abstract

 

Sirach 24 can be read as a compendium of Ben Sira’s ideology of Wisdom, bringing together the essential concepts of the book: Wisdom, Law, prophecy, and temple worship. Scholars long ago recognized the dense network of intertextual links between this chapter and other biblical texts, as well as the background of Ben Sira’s image of Lady Wisdom in Hellenistic texts. One obvious biblical precedent of Sirach 24 has gone virtually unnoticed so far: the Song of Songs. This essay attempts (1) to demonstrate the close affinity of Sirach 24 with the Song of Songs; (2) to disclose the underlying ideology of the goddess as mediatrix of divine knowledge, prominent not only in the ancient Near Eastern love lyrics, but also in prophecy; and (3) to show that the book of Ben Sira, while being a product of the Hellenistic-Jewish culture, at the same time forms a part of the ancient Near Eastern heritage of early Judaism.

 

Then much further on, beginning on p. 380, Nissinen will write:

 

The image of Lady Wisdom as a fruit-bearing tree is likely to allude to Prov 3:18 where Wisdom is called a tree of life, which, again, leads the thoughts to the Garden of Eden. The rivers surrounding Eden are also mentioned in Sir 24:25–27.27 In addition to these and many other probable subtexts, the Song of Songs provides a parallel for almost every line of Sir 24:13–20.

….

The parallelism of cedar and cypress (Sir 24:13) can be found both in Cant 1:17 and in SAA 3 14:9–10; in both cases, however, referring to the interior of the scene of lovemaking. Moreover, in Cant 5:15, the male partner is compared with a cedar, paralleled by the mountains of Lebanon, whereas the “brothers” of the female partner, depicted as an adolescent girl, say of her: “If she is a door, we will panel … her with cedar.” Lebanon and Hermon appear together in Cant 4:8, and Lebanon is also a common metaphor elsewhere in the Song of Songs (Cant 3:9; 4:11, 15; 7:5).

 

While the woman of the Song of Songs is associated with a palm tree in Cant 7:8–9 and En-Gedi appears as a seat of vineyards (Cant 1:14), the statement of Lady Wisdom about herself in Sir 24:14, “Like a palm tree in En-Gedi I stand out,” rather calls to mind what the woman says about her beloved: “Like an apple tree among the trees of the wood, so is my beloved among men” (Cant 2:3). Obviously, Ben Sira does not read this imagery as gender-specific but is free to adapt the originally male image to Lady Wisdom, the focus being on her outstanding quality. Jericho is not mentioned in the Song of Songs, nor does a rose garden … feature anywhere in the Hebrew Bible. Nevertheless, the garden is one of the basic topoi in ancient Near Eastern love lyrics in general (cf. SAA 3 14 r.17–18, 23–25),29 and the woman is equated with a garden in Cant 4:12–14, a passage that is likely to have inspired Sirach 24.

 

The Song of Songs does not know olive trees or plane trees (Sir 24:14), but as a plane tree, Wisdom (according to one branch of the textual tradition …) “is lofty beside the water”, which not only alludes to Ps 1:3 but also to Cant 4:13, where pomegranates with choice fruits grow by watering channels. …. What follows both in Sir 24:15 and in Cant 4:14 is a catalogue of fragrances, of which cinnamon and fragrant cane,32 as well as myrrh, are common to Sirach and the Song of Songs, whereas the galbanum, onycha and mastic clearly draw from Exod 30:34. …. In the Song of Songs, the fragrance is poured forth to seduce the male beloved to the garden (cf. Sir 24:19), but in Sir 24:15, Wisdom herself is compared to the odor of incense in the holy tent, the prototype of the temple of Jerusalem which now is her domain (cf. Sir 24:10–11). There is nothing in the Song of Songs to compare with incense in a sanctuary, since no cult places are mentioned in this book; but it is all the more interesting to find a rather exact counterpart to this line of Ben Sira in the Love Lyrics of Nabû and Tašmetu, where it is said to the goddess Tašmetu: “Save, sit down in the cella! Let (the scent of) pure juniper fill the sanctuary” (SAA 3 14:8). The image of the savior-goddess in the cella is closely related to that of Lady Wisdom ministering in the holy tent, and Ben Sira’s use of this motif is a wonderful example of the adaptation of love poetry in the context of worship, Wisdom assuming the role of the goddess.

 

Mackey’s comment: The non-Hebrew myths are, I would suggest, pagan adaptations of the original Hebrew wisdom, rather than being the inspiration for the latter. In similar fashion, Solomonic love poetry influenced Eighteenth Dynasty Egyptian love poetry. See e.g. my:

 

Solomon and Sheba

 


 

Nissinen continues:

 

Terebinth … Sir 24:16) is in the Hebrew Bible a tree … that is associated with both love and worship … hence it is a most fitting metaphor for Lady Wisdom’s cultic and erotic aspects, echoing even the ancient Palestinian tree goddess. …. The Song of Songs does not mention this tree, but it does speak about sitting in the shade of a fruit-bearing tree (here a metaphor for the male beloved), enjoying the delights of wine and love (Cant 2:3–6). For Tašmetu, “the shade of a sprig of juniper is shelter for my Nabû and my games” (SAA 3 14:11). The goddess is sitting in the sanctuary filled with the odor of juniper in the shade of cedar and cypress – imagery closely akin to the self-praise of Lady Wisdom, who, while sojourning in the temple of Jerusalem, “puts forth delights like the vine” (Sir

24:17). The erotic connotations of fruits, well attested in the Song of Songs and in the ancient Near Eastern love poetry (Cant 4:13, 16; SAA 3 14 r.20, 30) … are conspicuous also in Sir 24:17, 19, and Wisdom’s invitation to those who yearn for her to come and be filled with her fruits is closely reminiscent of Cant 4:16: “Let my beloved come to his garden and eat his choice fruits” (cf. Cant 6:2 and SAA 3 14 r.30: “May her eyes see the plucking of my fruit”). A conscious allusion to the Song of Songs becomes all the more probable when we notice that the fruit metaphor is followed by that of honey and honeycomb in both texts: “I eat my honeycomb with my honey” (Cant 5:1) – “My remembrance is sweeter than honey, inheritance better than the honeycomb” (Sir 24:20). It seems like Lady Wisdom presents herself superior even to the (divine) love praised by the Song of Songs.

 

 

Image result for solomon and shunammite

 

The motif of the insatiable hunger and thirst in Sir 24:21 does not find a direct counterpart in the Song of Songs, and the same is true for the assurance of those who obey Wisdom not being put to shame. The Love Lyrics of Nabû and Tašmetu, however, starts with a programmatic expression of trust and devotion to the divine couple, which reads like a positive formulation of the same idea: “May anyone trust in whomever he trusts! As for us, we trust in Nabû, we are devoted to Tašmetu” (SAA 3 14:1–3; cf. Sir 15:4b: “He will trust in her [scil. Wisdom] and not be put to shame”).

….

 

Apart from chapter 24, motifs and metaphors related to the Song of Songs and ancient Near Eastern love poetry can be found in other parts of the book of Ben Sira as well. In another poem about Wisdom, Sir 14:20–15:10, spying at the gates of Wisdom and peeping through her windows (14:22–23) is clearly reminiscent of Cant 5:2–4, and the erotic connotations of the tree metaphor can, again, be traced in 14:26–27.39 Wisdom provides the one received by her with food and drink (15:3; cf. Cant 4:16–5:1; 6:2); he will not be put to shame (15:4; cf. Sir 24:22) but will have an elevated position among his peers (15:5; cf. SAA 3 14 r.26: “Among the counsellors, her [scil. Tašmetu’s] throne is foremost”).

 

More distant but still recognizable echoes from the Song of Songs can be heard also in the praise of Lady Wisdom concluding the book of Ben Sira (Sir 51:13–22). “Wisdom was my wet nurse; thanks to the one who taught me” (51:17) may be taken as a heavily modified reading of “I would lead you and bring you to the house of my mother, and you would teach me40” (Cant 8:2). While this remains somewhat unclear, the source of the seeking-and-finding motif in Sir 51:18–21 can quite plausibly be traced to Cant 3:1–4 and 5:2–6. Rather than repeating either version of the story of the nocturnal yearning of the woman, Ben Sira picks up images such as opening the door of Wisdom with his hand (Sir 51:19; cf. Cant 5:4a) … and the bodily thrill caused by the passion for Wisdom (Sir 51:21; cf. Cant 5:4b).

 

Finally, a series of allusions to the Song of Songs can be found in the praise of Simon the high priest concluding Ben Sira’s laus patrum (Sir 50:1–24).42 This is important to note because the description of the high priest unmistakably repeats motifs used in Sir 24:1–22 of Wisdom herself. He is now the cedar of Lebanon, surrounded by the “sons of Aaron” like the willows growing by the water (Sir 50:12; cf. 24:13–14, 31). The way Simon “looked forth from the tent, as he came from the house of the veil” (Sir 50:5) inevitably brings to mind the “Lady at the window” motif … the adaptation of which to a male person is fully understandable if the high priest is representing the qualities of Lady Wisdom. A variation of the “Lady at the window” image has also been recognized in Cant 6:10, a verse that corresponds to the astral imagery used of the high priest in Sir 50:6–7: “Who is this that gazes down like the dawn, beautiful as the moon, radiant as the sun, terrifying as the nidgālôt.” ….

 

 

Image result for fair as the moon bright as the sun

Thursday, April 26, 2018

Solomon and Charlemagne. Part Four: Carolingians a “new Israel”



 Image result for charlemagne

 

by

 

Damien F. Mackey


 

 

 

Part Four:
Carolingians a “new Israel”

 

 

 

“Therefore, once Charlemagne received the imperial title, the concept of the Franks

as the “new Israel,” already circulating at court, began to intensify”.

 

Constance B. Bouchard

 
 

 

 

So much of French regal history, Merovingian and Carolingian, smacks of the Bible.

King Chlodomer, for instance, smacks of the Elamite king, Chedorlaomer (Genesis 14:1):

 

Chedorlaomer and Chlodomer

 


 

Whilst King Chilperic I has been likened to ‘Herod’:

 

King Chilperic I a 'Nero and Herod'

 


  

and, again, to the wicked Old Testament king, Ahab: “Gregory, who as bishop of Tours had confrontations with Chilperic and Fredegund, implicitly likens himself in books 5 and 6 to Elijah prophesying against Ahab and Jezebel …”. (Zachary S. Schiffman, The Birth of the Past, p. 123).

 

Along similar lines we find:

 

Queen Brunhild [as] the 'second Jezebel'

 


 

And, in a supposedly later era, there is this classic:

 

Isabella of France, ‘iron virago’, ‘Jezebel’

 


 

To name just a few.

 

Perhaps even more apparent are the striking Davidic and Solomonic likenesses of the Carolingian kings. See e.g. my:

 


 


 

“Emperor Charlemagne’s life bears some uncanny likenesses to
that of the ancient King Solomon of Israel and his family”.

 

and:

 


 


 

“For AD history to be fully convincing and to be made to rest on firm foundations, it will need to undergo a rigorous revision similar to the one that scholars have been undertaking for BC history, with the application of a revised stratigraphy. There may be some indications that the history of Charlemagne is yet far from having been established on such firm stratigraphical foundations”.

 

No wonder that conspiracy theorists and authors, such as Dan Brown, have had so much fun with the Merovingians and Carolingians!

To give just one intriguing example of this sort of thing, we read at:


 

The Carolingians were partly of Merovingian descent, but more importantly, they represented the union of the once divided lineage of the several families responsible for the formation of Mithraism, mainly, the House of Herod, of Commagene, the Julio-Claudian Emperors of Rome, and the Priest-Kings of Emesa. This lineage had survived in two branches. Julia, the heiress of the Edomite royal bloodline, was the daughter of Herod Phollio King of Chalcis, whose grandfather was Herod the Great, and whose mother was the daughter of Salome. Julia married Tigranes King of Armenia, the son of Alexander of Judea. Their son Alexander married Iotape of Commagene, the daughter of Antiochus IV, from whom was descended St. Arnulf, was a Frankish noble who had great influence in the Merovingian kingdoms as Bishop of Metz, and who was later canonized as a saint, and who lived from 582 to 640 AD.[2]

 

Always tracing it all back to biblical kings.

I find it most interesting that there is a connection made here between an Antiochus IV and the biblical king Herod the Great, since, recently, I have actually made so bold as to identify the latter, Herod, as Antiochus IV ‘Epiphanes’ of the Maccabean era:

 

Jesus Christ born in Maccabean era

 


 

And I suspect that the “Antiochus IV” named in the above quote is simply, as I have written:

 

Antiochus IV 'Epiphanes' Doubled

 


 

 

Anyway, Constance B. Bouchard has, in “Images of the Merovingians and Carolingians”, provided extra support for the Israel-like-ness of the enigmatic Carolingians and Charlemagne:


 

Although historians do not denigrate the quite real Carolingian achievements, they are now analyzing the many models, from the kings of ancient Israel to the Caesars, to which the emperors were compared by their publicists.

….

The Carolingians themselves appear to have been very sensitive to the possibility that they would be considered rulers who enjoyed divine favor only at the pleasure of the pope. Therefore, once Charlemagne received the imperial title, the concept of the Franks as the “new Israel,” already circulating at court, began to intensify. The choice of the ancient Hebrew kings provided a model which would not be based on a connection to the papacy.42 The kings of Israel had stood halfway between their people and God, without needing the mediation of priests and certainly not of popes. As the new David and the new Solomon, Charlemagne and his heir could take on a similar position: one that required great responsibility, certainly, but one in which no one stood between them and God.

 

Not surprisingly, too, we find books and articles with titles like “The Franks as the New Israel? Education for an Identity from Pippin to Charlemagne,” by M. Garrison (in Hen and Innes (eds.), Uses of the Past).